In “Immigrant Nations” (2011) the Dutch professor Paul Scheffer points out that immigrants often feel alienated in new surroundings and hang onto old customs as an aid to survival.
Clashes are inevitable if large numbers of asylum seekers arrive in European towns unless there are shared common values and allegiances to bring people together as a nation. I’m defining the nation as an “imagined community”(Anderson 1983).
I often wonder how someone like Owen Jones would fare if he moved to a tiny village in Somalia with no internet, no English, no familiar rituals, value system? He and others on the left gloss over the contradictions of integrating people who come from this type of place into the U.K. which has always prided itself on a history of tolerance and freedom but which is now being sorely tried by the open door policies of the government.
Why do these immigrants keep insisting on going to countries full of people they hate, where they're alienated, where they just want to recreate their backwards homeland, which they apparently wanted to leave? Why don't they just stay in their birthplaces?
Owen Jones would never go to an Islamic country like Somalia. No white people would move to Somalia. Somalians move to European countries for free handouts, housing, benefits, food, and crime.
None of this migration should have happened in the first place. Who is behind it? That is the answer to this problem.
I noticed Paul, at the beginning of the article, you stated that it is largely in part due to our failure to integrate those from other places however, I would say that it is in large part, the problem of those particular cultures to integrate themselves into our society, other than that, I think the article was spot on
There's nothing to integrate. They've never integrated anywhere they've gone because it is impossible. Their mere presence is a burden and a punishment, and they will admit as much when asked.
Great piece Paul. It is our duty to meet with our MPs, leaders and schools to Ash then for positions on these subjects. For plans and actions. If we don't, our children will pay
The lack of integration and the refusal (even hostility) to embrace traditional British values is the bell tolling the demise of over 1500 years of English culture. It's all too sad, and worse, self-inflicted by politicians who hate who are.
From a former Immigration Officer: I have been warning about this for many years, but without success ; now we are facing an increasingly unstable, fractured society, buckling under the sheer weight of numbers, the promotion of multi-culti ideology and resurgent Islamist entryism, which is gaming our weak systems with great success.
No government to date has taken any serious steps to reverse these trends and they will shortly converge with the restrictions imposed by the barmy Net Zero commitments.
I wonder if the Sex Pistols got a glimpse of the future with 'Anarchy in the UK'.
Right on so many levels Paul. School is for education not indoctrination. You can not argue against an ideology. Anti-terror squad should be deployed backed if necessary by the army.
The war got to the UK through years of suicidal immigration policies. How did so many Muslims end up in the UK? Don't try "colonialism" or "bombing." Many ended up in Sweden, Ireland, Denmark, Finland as well, and they had no colonies. And who would go directly to the source of what they claim is the problem? They're not seeking asylum; they're seeking free housing, benefits, food, and crime.
There is nothing to integrate here. Third world Muslim migrants have not integrated to any European country they've gone to, and that is the point. It will never happen. Their mere presence is a punishment, and everyone admits that when pushed, hence the "colonialism" nonsense. The purpose of this invasion is to punish the UK.
The benefits, free healthcare, housing, food, rape gangs, etc. must be denied to these people, and there must be immediate deportations, not just of the worst criminals. Who prevents this?
Who is behind the mass invasion of Europe by these migrants? That is the answer to the problem.
You are so right Paul. Diversity is not a strength, integration is.
None of these people have ever integrated, anywhere they go. And that is the point.
This is delusional thinking. The purpose of migration is to destroy the country these migrants land in, and the people behind the migration know this.
In “Immigrant Nations” (2011) the Dutch professor Paul Scheffer points out that immigrants often feel alienated in new surroundings and hang onto old customs as an aid to survival.
Clashes are inevitable if large numbers of asylum seekers arrive in European towns unless there are shared common values and allegiances to bring people together as a nation. I’m defining the nation as an “imagined community”(Anderson 1983).
I often wonder how someone like Owen Jones would fare if he moved to a tiny village in Somalia with no internet, no English, no familiar rituals, value system? He and others on the left gloss over the contradictions of integrating people who come from this type of place into the U.K. which has always prided itself on a history of tolerance and freedom but which is now being sorely tried by the open door policies of the government.
Why do these immigrants keep insisting on going to countries full of people they hate, where they're alienated, where they just want to recreate their backwards homeland, which they apparently wanted to leave? Why don't they just stay in their birthplaces?
Owen Jones would never go to an Islamic country like Somalia. No white people would move to Somalia. Somalians move to European countries for free handouts, housing, benefits, food, and crime.
None of this migration should have happened in the first place. Who is behind it? That is the answer to this problem.
I noticed Paul, at the beginning of the article, you stated that it is largely in part due to our failure to integrate those from other places however, I would say that it is in large part, the problem of those particular cultures to integrate themselves into our society, other than that, I think the article was spot on
There's nothing to integrate. They've never integrated anywhere they've gone because it is impossible. Their mere presence is a burden and a punishment, and they will admit as much when asked.
Great piece Paul. It is our duty to meet with our MPs, leaders and schools to Ash then for positions on these subjects. For plans and actions. If we don't, our children will pay
Thanks, Ash.
Great article
Thanks, John.
The lack of integration and the refusal (even hostility) to embrace traditional British values is the bell tolling the demise of over 1500 years of English culture. It's all too sad, and worse, self-inflicted by politicians who hate who are.
From a former Immigration Officer: I have been warning about this for many years, but without success ; now we are facing an increasingly unstable, fractured society, buckling under the sheer weight of numbers, the promotion of multi-culti ideology and resurgent Islamist entryism, which is gaming our weak systems with great success.
No government to date has taken any serious steps to reverse these trends and they will shortly converge with the restrictions imposed by the barmy Net Zero commitments.
I wonder if the Sex Pistols got a glimpse of the future with 'Anarchy in the UK'.
Right on so many levels Paul. School is for education not indoctrination. You can not argue against an ideology. Anti-terror squad should be deployed backed if necessary by the army.
When you give in as a nation to Islamist extremists for decades this is what you get.
Good article.
But all I see is weaknes of the UK
The difference is that people like me want it to remain and be strong...
While others see it as an opportunity.
The war got to the UK through years of suicidal immigration policies. How did so many Muslims end up in the UK? Don't try "colonialism" or "bombing." Many ended up in Sweden, Ireland, Denmark, Finland as well, and they had no colonies. And who would go directly to the source of what they claim is the problem? They're not seeking asylum; they're seeking free housing, benefits, food, and crime.
There is nothing to integrate here. Third world Muslim migrants have not integrated to any European country they've gone to, and that is the point. It will never happen. Their mere presence is a punishment, and everyone admits that when pushed, hence the "colonialism" nonsense. The purpose of this invasion is to punish the UK.
The benefits, free healthcare, housing, food, rape gangs, etc. must be denied to these people, and there must be immediate deportations, not just of the worst criminals. Who prevents this?
Who is behind the mass invasion of Europe by these migrants? That is the answer to the problem.